Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.365 [SLACK_000579] · slack_pm:msg:03809

Date: 2021-01-07 11:45
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Interesting to speculate what his move would be - would he imagine another republican in the trump mould for 2024? In which case he would want to keep the nutters on side

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-07 11:43 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut I doubt it'll add to the transmission phenotype - but I'm certainly not reassured by Jesse's study yesterday
2021-01-07 11:43 Andrew Rambaut open

@Andrew Rambaut By the way - E484K is called 'Erik' in our terminology but I think it probably should be 'Eeek'
2021-01-07 11:43 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut Haha, I like Eeek - definitely has to be Eeek!
2021-01-07 11:44 Robert F. Garry open

Yes Congress could do it, but Mitch would have to agree.
2021-01-07 11:45 Andrew Rambaut

Interesting to speculate what his move would be - would he imagine another republican in the trump mould for 2024? In which case he would want to keep the nutters on side
2021-01-07 11:46 Andrew Rambaut open

If he agrees to impeach then it would signal the trump project is dead
2021-01-07 11:47 Andrew Rambaut open

My money would be on keeping the options open and not doing anything for 2 weeks
2021-01-07 11:48 Robert F. Garry open

Hawley and Cruz are making the big try the Trump base.
2021-01-07 11:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

"My money would be on keeping the options open and not doing anything for 2 weeks" - I'm worried this is how it's going to go as well - American Inaction. It's a thing.I think Mitch would sign on.

Full conversation →