Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.365 [SLACK_000579] · slack_pm:msg:03804

Date: 2021-01-07 11:42
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Andrew Rambaut There have been quite a few spontaneous E484Ks over the months so it may just be coincidence. I have heard a bit about the cases and there is nothing particular about them.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-07 11:40 Andrew Rambaut open

Mad
2021-01-07 11:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

:100:
2021-01-07 11:41 Andrew Rambaut open

@Andrew Rambaut Not yet but close.
2021-01-07 11:42 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut Okay, good - I really would like to see that data. I'm freaked out enough as it is, just wondering ifI need to take that and 2x...
2021-01-07 11:42 Andrew Rambaut

@Andrew Rambaut There have been quite a few spontaneous E484Ks over the months so it may just be coincidence. I have heard a bit about the cases and there is nothing particular about them.
2021-01-07 11:43 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut I doubt it'll add to the transmission phenotype - but I'm certainly not reassured by Jesse's study yesterday
2021-01-07 11:43 Andrew Rambaut open

@Andrew Rambaut By the way - E484K is called 'Erik' in our terminology but I think it probably should be 'Eeek'
2021-01-07 11:43 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut Haha, I like Eeek - definitely has to be Eeek!
2021-01-07 11:44 Robert F. Garry open

Yes Congress could do it, but Mitch would have to agree.

Full conversation →