Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.316 [SLACK_000530] · slack_pm:msg:03319

Date: 2020-12-14 18:16
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: FOIA, records and transparency

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

The most likely emails of ours that could *possibly* be FOIAed are the ones with .gov email recipients. I don't think any of those are harmful - on the contrary.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
The most likely emails of ours that could possibly be FOIAed are the ones with .gov email recipients.	needs context	uncertain explicit hedge	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

The most likely emails of ours that could *possibly* be FOIAed are the ones with .gov email recipients.

needs context

uncertain explicit hedge

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-12-14 17:16 Edward C. Holmes open

I stand by that statement.
2020-12-14 17:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

Boys, I win the day - this too I predicted. Apparently... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 5.49.32 PM.png]
2020-12-14 17:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Although, Andrew gets some points for his response to my email too... :wink: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 5.50.59 PM.png]
2020-12-14 18:02 Edward C. Holmes open

That one is definitely in.
2020-12-14 18:16 Robert F. Garry

The most likely emails of ours that could *possibly* be FOIAed are the ones with .gov email recipients. I don't think any of those are harmful - on the contrary.
2020-12-14 18:17 Robert F. Garry open

I do want our suggested name of Wuhan Turtle Flu virus to show up somewhere.

Full conversation →