Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.316 [SLACK_000530] · slack_pm:msg:03315

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I stand by that statement.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-12-14 16:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Eddie, what's the language in the FOIA request? Can they even request this - I mean, US organization and you're inAustralia
2020-12-14 17:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Okie dokie - all good. Reading through our old emails, it's all good stuff + terrible jokes - I'm totally ok with that :wink:
2020-12-14 17:09 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, it's just shitty jokes. I can't see usrtk.org going much better than "Emails reveal proximal origins authors'lamentable use of puns".
2020-12-14 17:12 Andrew Rambaut open

"I have to say that I am disappointed that he has not threatened to fuck my mother after our trashing of snake flu." -Eddie
2020-12-14 17:16 Edward C. Holmes

I stand by that statement.
2020-12-14 17:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

Boys, I win the day - this too I predicted. Apparently... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 5.49.32 PM.png]
2020-12-14 17:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Although, Andrew gets some points for his response to my email too... :wink: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 5.50.59 PM.png]
2020-12-14 18:02 Edward C. Holmes open

That one is definitely in.
2020-12-14 18:16 Robert F. Garry open

The most likely emails of ours that could *possibly* be FOIAed are the ones with .gov email recipients. I don't think any of those are harmful - on the contrary.