COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.298 [SLACK_000512] · slack_pm:msg:03106

Page text: p.298 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-06 10:54
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Doh. I was thinking of RmYN02

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-06 10:52 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Compared to all the pango/bat genomes, those positions appear ancestral to me - Hu-1 and RmYN01 have derived residues in those positions.
  2. 2020-12-06 10:53 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Here's an alignment - it's pretty messy and some duplicates... [shared file(s): 2020.12.06_pango-bat-sars2_alignment.geneious]
  3. 2020-12-06 10:53 Andrew Rambaut open
    Am I going mad - I just downloaded RmYN01 from GISAID and it is coming out as more divergent than RaTG13?
  4. 2020-12-06 10:53 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yes
  5. 2020-12-06 10:54 Andrew Rambaut
    Doh. I was thinking of RmYN02
  6. 2020-12-06 10:55 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I think it's fair to say that the lineage that led to WA1 > WH04 is probably older than the lineage that led to Hu-1.And yeah - RmYN02.. :wink: That one is ancestral in those positions too
  7. 2020-12-06 10:56 Andrew Rambaut open
    We have always used WH04 as the root -
  8. 2020-12-06 10:57 Kristian G. Andersen open
    WA1 may be a more appropriate one - firmly placing the start of the pandemic in the United States :wink:
  9. 2020-12-06 10:58 Andrew Rambaut open
    Question is do we consider that WA1 (or more likely a Chinese genome such as hCoV-19/Fujian/8/2020) is basal to WH04?

Full conversation →