Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.286 [SLACK_000500] · slack_pm:msg:02972

Date: 2020-11-30 16:45
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes
Topics: Intelligence community assessments Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesis

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

"Similarly, no mention is made by officials of a so-called laboratory leak, or that the virus was man-made, as somecritics, including top US officials, have claimed without evidence."

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
"Similarly, no mention is made by officials of a so-called laboratory leak, or that the virus was man-made, as somecritics, including top US officials, have claimed without evidence."	quoted / not their view	quoted_external inside quotation marks	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

"Similarly, no mention is made by officials of a so-called laboratory leak, or that the virus was man-made, as somecritics, including top US officials, have claimed without evidence."

quoted / not their view

quoted_external inside quotation marks

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-30 16:37 Edward C. Holmes open

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/30/asia/wuhan-china-covid-intl/index.html
2020-11-30 16:45 Edward C. Holmes

"Similarly, no mention is made by officials of a so-called laboratory leak, or that the virus was man-made, as somecritics, including top US officials, have claimed without evidence."

Full conversation →