Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.280-281 [SLACK_000494] · slack_pm:msg:02917

Date: 2020-11-26 17:54
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Furin cleavage site and molecular features

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes - the ringer was the furin cleavage site which threw everyone off since on first glance it appears so striking. Buton the deeper dive there is no way that the FCS is anything but a product of nature. I'm starting to think that a PO2could be very useful - lot's of pieces to compile actually - no confidence whatsoever that the WHO or Lancet investigations will add much {maybe the opposite].

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Yes - the ringer was the furin cleavage site which threw everyone off since on first glance it appears so striking.	needs context	uncertain explicit hedge	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

Yes - the ringer was the furin cleavage site which threw everyone off since on first glance it appears so striking.

needs context

uncertain explicit hedge

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-26 17:54 Robert F. Garry

Yes - the ringer was the furin cleavage site which threw everyone off since on first glance it appears so striking. Buton the deeper dive there is no way that the FCS is anything but a product of nature. I'm starting to think that a PO2could be very useful - lot's of pieces to compile actually - no confidence whatsoever that the WHO or Lancet investigations will add much {maybe the opposite].

Full conversation →