Slack / Private Message Drop — page 280
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000494
← p.279 p.281 → · this page in the original PDF · package
*Eddie Holmes* [9:50 PM]
I'm not sure what I would conclude except that it is completely inappropriate to discuss the thoughts of the editors at
Nature. In addition, they completely fail to note that it was Clare that suggested Nature Medicine!! Clare seems to
have rejected the paper largely on the grounds that she thought it would go out of date quickly.
[2020-11-26 06:12:26]
[Robert Garry]
Tommy has 6 SARS-CoV-2 sero-positive pangolins that are currently being metagenomically sequenced. The other
news - which is obviously strictly confidential - is that someone in China (Tong?) has apparently obtained a
MERS-like virus from a pangolin.
[2020-11-26 06:16:13]
[Robert Garry]
Just revisiting some earlier threads - The one from July 27th vis-a-vis Deep throat. Why Claire "rejected" was
obvioysly incorrect - PO1 has held up well.
[2020-11-26 06:19:31]
[Robert Garry]
*11 November 2020* Editor's Note: Readers are alerted that concerns have been raised about the identity of the
pangolin samples reported in this paper and their relationship to previously published pangolin samples. Appropriate
editorial action will be taken once this matter is resolved. The second Eddie quote also pertinent in light of Xiao et al.
editors note *11 November 2020* Editor's Note: Readers are alerted that concerns have been raised about the
identity of the pangolin samples reported in this paper and their relationship to previously published pangolin
samples. Appropriate editorial action will be taken once this matter is resolved. This is Alina and her Drastic clique it
seems, but new pango sequences would be very helpful.
[2020-11-26 06:41:34]
[Robert Garry]
I'm also very interested in the MERS-like virus from the pangos. Long story short: a few weeks ago I mentioned a lot
of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein seroreactivity in preCOVID blood from Sierra Leonians. The N rxty has held up [the
Spike/RBDmostly did not], but more complicated. We expressed the nucleocapsid of the other human coronaviruses
to see if this could be explained by rxty to common cold viruses. HKU1 N gave us a little trouble but turns out that
the SARS2 rxty can mostly be explained by rxty to MERS nucleocapsid (they are 50% identical, 79% similar at the
amino acid level). Got the folks in Kenema doing PCR of nasal swabs and saliva. Obviously this will be more
meaningful if we can - you know - actually find the "MERS-like" virus. May explain why the COVID pandemic seems
to be sparing Africa.
[2020-11-26 12:11:34]
[Eddie Holmes]
Totally agree about the pangos Bob. Very important! I'll check with Tommy about where we are at. The Xiao et al.
group - who are straight, but naive - have more data but can't publish it because they have dishonoured their
institutions. That went well then.
[2020-11-26 14:39:23]
[Robert Garry]
Yes indeed - for me the GD pango RBD is game-over/mic drop for natural origin of SC2, No way the pango RBD
was selected in cell culture via passage of a bat cov. No one designed this sequence with a computer based on
SARS1. An independent isolate is unnecessary perhaps but would seal the deal except for the most entrenched
tinfoil hats.
[2020-11-26 15:17:50]
[Eddie Holmes]
Completely agree, although one presented in the Lam paper is independent. They took from the Li et al. Viruses
paper but then assembled another from scales. Also, critical to remember that there is a 2nd pango lineage in
Guangxi.
[2020-11-26 17:54:06]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/280
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:02909 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 279–280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02910 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02911 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02912 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02913 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02914 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02915 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02916 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280 |
| slack_pm:msg:02917 | 2020-11-26 | chat message | 280–281 |