Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.280 [SLACK_000494] · slack_pm:msg:02916

Date: 2020-11-26 15:17
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Completely agree, although one presented in the Lam paper is independent. They took from the Li et al. Viruses paper but then assembled another from scales. Also, critical to remember that there is a 2nd pango lineage in Guangxi.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-26 14:39 Robert F. Garry open

Yes indeed - for me the GD pango RBD is game-over/mic drop for natural origin of SC2, No way the pango RBD was selected in cell culture via passage of a bat cov. No one designed this sequence with a computer based on SARS1. An independent isolate is unnecessary perhaps but would seal the deal except for the most entrenched tinfoil hats.
2020-11-26 15:17 Edward C. Holmes

Completely agree, although one presented in the Lam paper is independent. They took from the Li et al. Viruses paper but then assembled another from scales. Also, critical to remember that there is a 2nd pango lineage in Guangxi.

Full conversation →