Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.245 · slack_pm:msg:02550

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

We'll get to the bottom of it. That also provided me with Weijun Chen's email address so I'm just contacting him now.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-30 17:06 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-01-30 at 8.50.31 PM.png
2020-10-30 17:06 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-10-31 at 11.03.59 am.png
2020-10-30 17:07 Edward C. Holmes open

This time-line makes sense but it does show that George Gao must have known about it before Dec. 30!! I never believed that one for a second.
2020-10-30 17:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, this totally makes sense given the timeline. And yeah - George must have known. The ENA entries must have been created for some other purpose and backfilled. But it _is_ weird - because they only created those four on ENA and then nothing for a few weeks. SLACK_000459
2020-10-30 17:09 Edward C. Holmes

We'll get to the bottom of it. That also provided me with Weijun Chen's email address so I'm just contacting him now.
2020-10-30 17:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

Okay, cool - I'm sure they're going to have a totally mundane explanation - like why RaTG13 was named that way cwink:
2020-10-30 17:09 Edward C. Holmes open

On it.
2020-10-30 17:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

(and one pretty critical thing against the bonkers theories in the paper - wouldn't WIV have been mentioned in theBioSample had the virus come from there....? :man-shrugging:)
2020-10-30 17:09 Edward C. Holmes open

Totally!