Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.233 [SLACK_000447] · slack_pm:msg:02422

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

She keeps perpetuating the crap that nobody can assemble the genomes from the raw seq data.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-27 09:25 Robert F. Garry open

Well - I don't think she should be shocked at all. [shared file(s): image.png]
2020-10-27 09:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

One additional proof that she's an idiot.
2020-10-27 09:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

I wonder if they mentioned the Broad Institute... I'm sure Lander would be happy about that.
2020-10-27 09:42 Robert F. Garry

She keeps perpetuating the crap that nobody can assemble the genomes from the raw seq data.
2020-10-27 09:43 Robert F. Garry open

Just guessing, but I think Eric would not be happy.
2020-10-27 09:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

*She* may not be able to assemble the genomes because she has no idea what she's doing - however, other people (myself included) can. Easily. I even made the bam files publicly available for anybody to download.
2020-10-27 10:03 Andrew Rambaut open

It sounds like the Broad needs to do an intervention. Just discuss what she is trying to achieve from this.
2020-10-27 10:06 Andrew Rambaut open

Perhaps they could actually go through the data with her and give her the opportunity to try to persuade a few ofthem that know what they are doing. She won't be able to but perhaps they could bring her back from the brink, save her career (assuming they want to).