Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.226 [SLACK_000440] · slack_pm:msg:02338

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

She has really nailed her colours to the mast now. Explicitly suggesting a conspiracy amongst scientists and editors?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-21 11:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Eddie Holmes - I think she might be talking about your data... https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1318969676886573058?s=20 What an idiot - this is one step too far.
2020-10-21 11:47 Robert F. Garry open

I would say several steps too far.
2020-10-21 11:48 Andrew Rambaut

She has really nailed her colours to the mast now. Explicitly suggesting a conspiracy amongst scientists and editors?
2020-10-21 11:51 Robert F. Garry open

Agreed - At least Yan is open with her politics.
2020-10-21 11:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

Simply unbelievable - had she mentioned specific people, this would be grounds for a lawsuit.