Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.225-226 [SLACK_000439] · slack_pm:msg:02336

Date: 2020-10-21 11:06
Type: chat message · slack
mentioned: Edward C. Holmes
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Eddie Holmes - I think she might be talking about your data... https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1318969676886573058?s=20 What an idiot - this is one step too far.

Links shared

social https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1318969676886573058?s=20

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-21 11:06 Kristian G. Andersen

@Eddie Holmes - I think she might be talking about your data... https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1318969676886573058?s=20 What an idiot - this is one step too far.
2020-10-21 11:47 Robert F. Garry open

I would say several steps too far.
2020-10-21 11:48 Andrew Rambaut open

She has really nailed her colours to the mast now. Explicitly suggesting a conspiracy amongst scientists and editors?
2020-10-21 11:51 Robert F. Garry open

Agreed - At least Yan is open with her politics.
2020-10-21 11:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

Simply unbelievable - had she mentioned specific people, this would be grounds for a lawsuit.

Full conversation →