Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.157 · slack_pm:msg:01605

Date: 2020-09-09 08:17 (hour precision)
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: FOIA, records and transparency

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

"Fortunately," my university is used to crazy people (mostly fueled or actually sent by fake covid survivor Curefinder) sending attack emails my direction. Good thing "Xander" appears not to have a clue about FOIA, actually something that can't be round-filed.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Good thing "Xander" appears not to have a clue about FOIA, actually something that can't be round-filed.	quoted / not their view	quoted_external inside quotation marks	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

Good thing "Xander" appears not to have a clue about FOIA, actually something that can't be round-filed.

quoted / not their view

quoted_external inside quotation marks

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

If we retracted it we might get our number 1 Altmetric rank back?
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

pseudonym - probably
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

but a published author https://www.giladorigami.com/origami-database-book/1045/Origami-on-the-Edge-by-Xander-D-Arena
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

we might get our number 1 Altmetric rank back? - hmmm - something "to consider...
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry

"Fortunately," my university is used to crazy people (mostly fueled or actually sent by fake covid survivor Curefinder) sending attack emails my direction. Good thing "Xander" appears not to have a clue about FOIA, actually something that can't be round-filed.
2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

Well also he seems to be claiming that (what he says) are flawed arguments is grounds for retraction - these are simply our assertions based on our interpretation of the data. That is simply a case for an academic reply.
2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

His Origami book looks cool but I won't be getting it now.
2020-09-09 08:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm convinced though [shared file(s): Request for Retraction Figure 1.jpg]
2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

"crafted by man using origami"

Full conversation →