Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.157 · slack_pm:msg:01604

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

we might get our number 1 Altmetric rank back? - hmmm - something "to consider...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

That is a made up name surely?
2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

If we retracted it we might get our number 1 Altmetric rank back?
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

pseudonym - probably
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

but a published author https://www.giladorigami.com/origami-database-book/1045/Origami-on-the-Edge-by-Xander-D-Arena
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry

we might get our number 1 Altmetric rank back? - hmmm - something "to consider...
2020-09-09 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

"Fortunately," my university is used to crazy people (mostly fueled or actually sent by fake covid survivor Curefinder) sending attack emails my direction. Good thing "Xander" appears not to have a clue about FOIA, actually something that can't be round-filed.
2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

Well also he seems to be claiming that (what he says) are flawed arguments is grounds for retraction - these are simply our assertions based on our interpretation of the data. That is simply a case for an academic reply.
2020-09-09 08:17 Andrew Rambaut open

His Origami book looks cool but I won't be getting it now.
2020-09-09 08:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm convinced though [shared file(s): Request for Retraction Figure 1.jpg]