Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.151 · slack_pm:msg:01545

Date: 2020-08-30 22:51 (hour precision)
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Intelligence community assessments

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

"Bob and I are now officially in the same 'Family' as the Grand Wizard of EgoHealth." This make me more than a "little bit nauseous," but so be it. I'm looking forward to the in-person meetings.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
"Bob and I are now officially in the same 'Family' as the Grand Wizard of EgoHealth." This make me more than a "little bit nauseous," but so be it.	quoted / not their view	quoted_external inside quotation marks	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

"Bob and I are now officially in the same 'Family' as the Grand Wizard of EgoHealth." This make me more than a "little bit nauseous," but so be it.

quoted / not their view

quoted_external inside quotation marks

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-08-30 22:51 Edward C. Holmes open

Had to write a reference for someone EgoHealth and I'm amused to see that they have a 'chief of staff':
2020-08-30 22:51 Edward C. Holmes open

*Aleksei Chmura, PhD* _ Chief of Staff_ EcoHealth Alliance
2020-08-30 22:51 Robert F. Garry

"Bob and I are now officially in the same 'Family' as the Grand Wizard of EgoHealth." This make me more than a "little bit nauseous," but so be it. I'm looking forward to the in-person meetings.
2020-08-30 22:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Probably the most jarring COVID abstract I have read in a paper I just got for review for Nature Medicine: _"Here, from 273 COVID-19 patients, we identified six cases of reinfection based on clinical, phylogenic, virological, serological, and epidemiological data. During the secondary episode, we observed re-emergence of COVID-19 symptoms, new pulmonary lesions on CT images, increased viral load, and secondary humoral immune responses. More importantly, reinfection occurred not only in patients with inadequate or loss of immunity after the primary infection, but also in patients with measurable levels of neutralizing antibodies."_I need to look more carefully tomorrow morning, but on first glance the paper looks solid... This would not be good tosay the least.
2020-08-30 22:51 Andrew Rambaut open

Are the genomes different? Could these be chronic infections?
2020-08-30 22:51 Andrew Rambaut open

I guess they are different given '_phylogenic'._
2020-08-30 22:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, different genomes so not relapse

Full conversation →