Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.115 [SLACK_000329] · slack_pm:msg:01183

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

(Jon would not be named/implicated)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-28 17:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's really sad. It would be kinda funny if he tried to get this out - we'd turn the attention right back on him trying tosuppress proper science and inquiry. It would make him look really bad...
2020-07-28 18:00 Edward C. Holmes open

Really bad
2020-07-28 18:34 Kristian G. Andersen open

Sneaky thought.... Should we go on the attack? We could raise this issue with Clare since this is a clear and direct breach of confidentiality of the review process.
2020-07-28 18:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

I could forward the email as coming "from a reporter disclosing confidential information from the review process".
2020-07-28 18:38 Kristian G. Andersen

(Jon would not be named/implicated)
2020-07-28 18:45 Kristian G. Andersen open

Let me sleep on this - but I think this is what we should do. Clare would know exactly who this person is and it would prevent/mitigate future bs from this person
2020-07-28 19:31 Kristian G. Andersen open

We could also write to Ralph on his Proton email - "Dear Ralph [...]"... Sorry, but I feel like having some 'fun' here. I'm offended by this email and I'm not known for just taking the punches...
2020-07-28 19:33 Edward C. Holmes open

Let me sleep on it as well. I would be good to be proactive, but we don't want to drop anyone else in the shit.