A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Ah, of course :zany_face:. Yeah, God knows what he does next - I invite him to do whatever and we'll crush that sadmotherfucker.
-
I'm 98% certain this is Baric... He'll deeply regret it if he goes public with this information - and I can't really see how that would possibly do him any good?
-
I agree - must be Baric. We have all the documentation to back up what happened and he'd look like a total knob for trying to suppress discussion of lab origins. Anonymous emailing a journo is so, so pathetic. Even Jeremy told methat the email was "total bollocks".
-
It's really sad. It would be kinda funny if he tried to get this out - we'd turn the attention right back on him trying tosuppress proper science and inquiry. It would make him look really bad...
-
2020-07-28 18:00
Edward C. Holmes
Really bad
-
Sneaky thought.... Should we go on the attack? We could raise this issue with Clare since this is a clear and direct breach of confidentiality of the review process.
-
I could forward the email as coming "from a reporter disclosing confidential information from the review process".
-
(Jon would not be named/implicated)
-
Let me sleep on this - but I think this is what we should do. Clare would know exactly who this person is and it would prevent/mitigate future bs from this person