COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.109-110 [SLACK_000323] · slack_pm:msg:01120

Page text: p.109, p.110 · original PDF

Date
2020-07-27 14:55
Type
chat message · slack
mentioned
Robert F. Garry
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Vaccines

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

And @Robert Garry - I have come around on challenge testing... What I really want to see is early challenge trials invery small (~10-20) groups of people to establish efficacy. If it doesn't work in those, no need to move forward... I'm SUPER uncomfortable with 30,000 people now getting the Moderna vaccine - can you imagine how detrimental thisis going to be for (COVID and otherwise) vaccine research if this vaccine actually isn't safe? Or may even lead toADE?Let's hope it works...

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I'm SUPER uncomfortable with 30,000 people now getting the Moderna vaccine - can you imagine how detrimental thisis going to be for (COVID and otherwise) vaccine research if this vaccine actually isn't safe? needs context speaker_own questions

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-07-27 14:45 Andrew Rambaut open
    Has Trevor found his next thing to go off on Twitter about?
  2. 2020-07-27 14:46 Kristian G. Andersen open
    "This virus doesn't lurk unobserved" - as is, definitely true - but I _do_ wonder if a pre-furin site virus could. But Iagree with you - I'm not sure such an analysis makes sense given our limited sampling. Assuming SARS2 came outof Yunnan diversity (which seems likely), it would be cool to go do some in-depth sampling from there. And yes, maybe we'll get the big reveal on Twitter :wink:
  3. 2020-07-27 14:48 Andrew Rambaut open
    But if the acquisition of the furin site is the point at which it becomes epidemic then once again we are back to the common ancestor of the current diversity being in late 2019. We don't have any other nodes to date.
  4. 2020-07-27 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
    .... ehm, yes. That is, of course, true... Unless it's been in a freezer since that outbreak in the Mojiang mine...:parrot:
  5. 2020-07-27 14:55 Kristian G. Andersen
    And @Robert Garry - I have come around on challenge testing... What I really want to see is early challenge trials invery small (~10-20) groups of people to establish efficacy. If it doesn't work in those, no need to move forward... I'm SUPER uncomfortable with 30,000 people now getting the Moderna vaccine - can you imagine how detrimental thisis going to be for (COVID and otherwise) vaccine research if this vaccine actually isn't safe? Or may even lead toADE?Let's hope it works...
  6. 2020-07-27 15:03 Robert F. Garry open
    Yeah - that's a good idea - you could get down to the best set of candidates with 10-20 person trials in a few months. Same with the monoclonals, though showing protection in animals before the in-ppl screening would be good.
  7. 2020-07-27 15:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup.
  8. 2020-07-27 15:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Okay, so back to topic - Eddie and I just received this from Jon. This is serious !channel, so we need to consider this carefully. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-07-27 at 3.08.41 PM.png]
  9. 2020-07-27 15:10 Robert F. Garry open
    Moderna trial started today in Louisiana BTW

Full conversation →