Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.68 [SLACK_000282] · slack_pm:msg:00694

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Robert Garry @Kristian Andersen Can you tell me anything about the RmYN02 cleavage site insertion? Is it predicted to be furin?

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
@Robert Garry @Kristian Andersen Can you tell me anything about the RmYN02 cleavage site insertion?	needs context	speaker_own	questions

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

@Robert Garry @Kristian Andersen Can you tell me anything about the RmYN02 cleavage site insertion?

needs context

speaker_own

questions

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-06-11 06:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

"Machine learning" you know. Fancy stuff.
2020-06-11 06:49 Andrew Rambaut

@Robert Garry @Kristian Andersen Can you tell me anything about the RmYN02 cleavage site insertion? Is it predicted to be furin?
2020-06-11 06:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen Jeremy Luban? I think Mike's study has already been accepted - I got it from NYT. Any insights from the UK data? Or is that part of the paper too?
2020-06-11 06:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nope, not a cleavage site - just an insertion (and you'll see a deletion upstream, so it's more of a shift).
2020-06-11 06:59 Andrew Rambaut open

Thanks.