Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.66-67 [SLACK_000280] · slack_pm:msg:00676

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

That is so weird - no, not me... But we're only four faculty at SRTI!!!

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-06-09 19:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm thinking mink. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/coronavirus-rips-through-dutch-mink-farms-triggeringculls-prevent-human-infections
2020-06-09 19:55 Edward C. Holmes open

I am thinking that as well...
2020-06-09 20:28 Edward C. Holmes open

BBC on the traffic data theory: "One expert at the Scripps Research Translational Institute said the research method used in the study was "very indirect and imprecise"."
2020-06-09 20:29 Edward C. Holmes open

Was that you Kristian?
2020-06-09 20:39 Kristian G. Andersen

That is so weird - no, not me... But we're only four faculty at SRTI!!!
2020-06-09 20:40 Kristian G. Andersen open

What's the link?
2020-06-09 21:14 Edward C. Holmes open

It's on the BBC rolling news thing (13:15 time spot). They spelt Scripps wrong: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-52988840
2020-06-09 21:30 Edward C. Holmes open

Yet more to enjoy [shared file(s): Sharri Wuhan Lab 6 June 2020.pdf]
2020-06-09 21:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

So idiotic.... there is NOTHING in that origin 'study' - nothing. Topol must be the quoted scientist on the BBC. Have you seen the actual study? Link doesn't work (really disappointed by Brownstein here - seriously, do you think they could cover this up if all of this massively ramped upin August? What about the genetic data? So dumb)