Slack / Private Message Drop — page 67
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000281
← p.66 p.68 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Kristian Andersen]
That is so weird - no, not me... But we're only four faculty at SRTI!!!
[2020-06-09 20:40:11]
[Kristian Andersen]
What's the link?
[2020-06-09 21:14:44]
[Eddie Holmes]
It's on the BBC rolling news thing (13:15 time spot). They spelt Scripps wrong:
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-52988840
[2020-06-09 21:30:54]
[Eddie Holmes]
Yet more to enjoy [shared file(s): Sharri Wuhan Lab 6 June 2020.pdf]
[2020-06-09 21:41:57]
[Kristian Andersen]
So idiotic.... there is NOTHING in that origin 'study' - nothing.
Topol must be the quoted scientist on the BBC. Have you seen the actual study? Link doesn't work (really
disappointed by Brownstein here - seriously, do you think they could cover this up if all of this massively ramped up
in August? What about the genetic data? So dumb)
[2020-06-10 09:42:39]
[Robert Garry]
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/09/conspiracies-covid-19-lab-false-pandemic?CMP=share_bt
n_tw "Writing in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Medicine, researchers strongly refuted the idea that the code had
been purposefully manipulated. Whereas the article in Nature Medicine_ _was written by senior virologists, one
author, John Fredrik Moxnes, the chief scientific adviser to the Norwegian military, has already withdrawn his name
from the paper cited by Dearlove - while scientists from the Francis Crick institute and Imperial College London also
dismissed its conclusions." I think he's calling us old, but whatever....
[2020-06-10 14:22:06]
[Eddie Holmes]
Good, but shame it is Daszak as he is hardly impartial. Even curefinder would have been preferable.
[2020-06-10 14:47:14]
[Kristian Andersen]
He manages to turn even this one into advertising for EgoHealth. The man's got no shame.
[2020-06-10 16:03:39]
[Eddie Holmes]
I know, it's putrid.
[2020-06-10 17:36:17]
[Kristian Andersen]
[thread - ID: 2020-06-10 17:36:17]
Sharing this confidentially - from a colleague here at Scripps. Using a pseudotyped assay, G614 infects cells much
more efficiently than D614. @Andrew Rambaut - any further insights on the epi from the UK data? (I got a paper
from Nature for review on this mutation too - but it was too light). [shared file(s): Manuscript
Figures_20200602_Final.pdf]
[2020-06-10 19:02:19]
[Eddie Holmes]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/67
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:00676 | 2020-06-09 | chat message | 66–67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00677 | 2020-06-09 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00678 | 2020-06-09 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00679 | 2020-06-09 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00680 | 2020-06-09 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00681 | 2020-06-10 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00682 | 2020-06-10 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00683 | 2020-06-10 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00684 | 2020-06-10 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00685 | 2020-06-10 | chat message | 67 |
| slack_pm:msg:00686 | 2020-06-10 | chat message | 67–68 |