COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.60 [SLACK_000274] · slack_pm:msg:00607

Page text: p.60 · original PDF

Date
2020-06-07 13:11
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Oh, really, Trevor? Off by one or two orders of magnitude in either direction kinda off? I'm truly baffled.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-06-07 13:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    Your man Nate gave him a good kicking.
  2. 2020-06-07 13:06 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, just saw that - I'm replying to say I agree with Nate. This is completely off base!
  3. 2020-06-07 13:07 Kristian G. Andersen open
    We KNOW we can't predict these kind of outcomes with _*any*_ certainty so we shouldn't even try - especially not when it comes to something this important. And on Twitter? Really?
  4. 2020-06-07 13:09 Andrew Rambaut open
    ```Trevor Bedford Replying to @trvrb (Keep in mind that my numbers above represent a best guess in the absence of real data. They could be easily be off.)```
  5. 2020-06-07 13:11 Kristian G. Andersen
    Oh, really, Trevor? Off by one or two orders of magnitude in either direction kinda off? I'm truly baffled.

Full conversation →