Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.22 [SLACK_000236] · slack_pm:msg:00226

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah, I think that's the one I shared too? The amount of stupidity makes my head hurt.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-05-12 20:57 Edward C. Holmes open

People are SO nice.
2020-05-12 21:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

I hope those fuckers slip in the shower.
2020-05-12 21:08 Edward C. Holmes open

Just got sent this as well.
2020-05-12 21:08 Edward C. Holmes open

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD3ztjqYGbg
2020-05-12 21:12 Kristian G. Andersen

Yeah, I think that's the one I shared too? The amount of stupidity makes my head hurt.
2020-05-12 21:12 Edward C. Holmes open

There's so many I've lost track!
2020-05-12 21:13 Edward C. Holmes open

Bob/Kristian - can you give me your latest thinking about whether any lab manipulation would involve cell culture orlive animal passage? Can we exclude the former?
2020-05-12 21:15 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, either cell culture or animal passage. I find animal passage to be unlikely, since those are complicated experiments. I'm starting to worry about cell culture again because of some of the things we're noticing in the cell culture sequencing experiments (plus all their historical work of exactly that type of work - but we have already discussed that).
2020-05-12 21:20 Edward C. Holmes open

What do we now think about the o-linked glycans and the low dn/ds values? Can they be used to rule anything in/out?