| Authored | 1 |
| Substantive (25+ words) | 1 |
| Threads posted in | 1 |
| Distinct active days | 1 |
| Words authored | 343 |
| Received (incl. group broadcast) | 2 |
Received counts include every message sent to a channel this person belonged to. That measures presence, not participation.
5 sentences were extracted and attributed to this person. Most are not their own opinion. Reporting the total as “5 statements” would misrepresent them.
| Person | Medium | Msgs | Span |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gretchen Weaver | 9 | 2021-02-16 – 2021-02-18 | |
| Lawrence A. Tabak | 9 | 2021-02-05 – 2021-02-18 |
Showing: own voice, substantive needs context quoted / not their view all
This is to let you know that OGE has responded to our request to consider whether the gift rule exception for awards applies in the case of the Lienhard Award the NAM presented to Dr.
Fauci Awards Package (Redacted), p.39 · original PDF · in context
As a result, we are unable to change our prior determination that he cannot accept the $40,000 cash gift associated with the Lienhard Award.
Fauci Awards Package (Redacted), p.39 · original PDF · in context
Hall Acting Associate General Counsel for Ethics Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official Ethics Division Department of Health and Human Services NOTICE: THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), ETHICS DIVISION IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S) NAMES ABOVE AND MAY CONTAIN PROTECTED, PRIVILEGED, OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT SHOULD NOT BE TRANSMITTED TO UNAUTHORIZED ADDRESSEES.
Fauci Awards Package (Redacted), p.39 · original PDF · in context
EMPLOYEE RECIPIENTS ARE COUNSELED THAT DISCIPLINARY ACTION FOR VIOLATING FEDERAL ETHICS REGULATIONS MAY NOT BE TAKEN AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE WHO HAS ENGAGED IN CONDUCT IN GOOD FAITH RELIANCE UPON THE PRIOR ADVICE OF ANY AGENCY ETHICS OFFICIAL, PROVIDED THAT THE EMPLOYEE HAS MADE FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES.
Fauci Awards Package (Redacted), p.39 · original PDF · in context
IF EMPLOYEE CONDUCT IS POTENTIALLY SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL SANCTIONS UNDER CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND RELATED STATUTES, RELIANCE OF THE ADVICE OF AN AGENCY ETHICS OFFICIAL IN INTERPRETING THE SCOPE OF SUCH STATUTES IS A FACTOR THAT MAY BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN EXERCISING PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION.
Fauci Awards Package (Redacted), p.39 · original PDF · in context