Slack / Private Message Drop — page 886
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001100
← p.885 p.887 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[2021-05-27 17:16:48]
[Eddie Holmes]
I can't believe they published this! If I can show that they did not use FCS then I can embarrass this idiot.
[2021-05-27 17:48:56]
[Robert Garry]
*No relevant priors?*
Clive Hamilton is a professor at Charles Sturt University in Canberra and author of Hidden Hand: Exposing How the
Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World.
[2021-05-27 17:56:59]
[Kristian Andersen]
I don't know of Shi having engineered FCSs - and that article seems like pure fiction, top to bottom, of somebody
who's bought into the Wade bullshit.
[2021-05-27 17:59:08]
[Eddie Holmes]
It's a disgrace.
[2021-05-27 18:02:48]
[Kristian Andersen]
Bill too?
I just don't get it. I really don't. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-27 at 5.58.50 PM.png]
[2021-05-27 18:06:34]
[Robert Garry]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524054/
[2021-05-27 18:07:57]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yeah, she's on that paper, but I don't believe that work is actually hers
[2021-05-27 18:08:47]
[Robert Garry]
exacty! In this paper Shi and Baric make a point mutation in the HKU4 spike. Baric did it nit Shi I'm pretty sure and
we're talking pseudoviruses which as the name implies are not viruses.
[2021-05-27 18:09:11]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yup
[2021-05-27 18:15:40]
[Kristian Andersen]
Honestly, the NYTimes article makes my blood boil. It's not "we need to consider a lab leak" - I get that and I agree
with that. However, it's the false equivalence and the idea that we have no data either way - it's just not true, but I'm
pretty damn sure somebody like Marc or Akiko haven't actually looked at any of it. It's just lazy - and dangerous.
And where in the article are they discussing the extremely high likelihood that this came in via infected animals? I
don't see any of that - only lab, lab, lab. It's clear that people who say "I'm keeping an open mind" very clearly
believe it came from a lab - they're just too afraid to admit it. At least fucking eDim is consistent on that point - I wish
the Bloomshitters would be too. This whole "I'm just asking questions" leads to a bottomless well of hypotheticals,
which is incredibly unhelpful.
[2021-05-27 18:16:14]
[Eddie Holmes]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/886
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:09179 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09180 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09181 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09182 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09183 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09184 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09185 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09186 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09187 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09188 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886 |
| slack_pm:msg:09189 | 2021-05-27 | chat message | 886–887 |