COVID-19 Records

Slack / Private Message Drop — page 774

of 1123 pages

← p.773 p.775 → · this page in the original PDF · package

SLACK_000988 [Robert Garry] It will be interesting to see what Daszak, Koopsman and others have to say about RelBloomshit. Surely they are not going to sit still and agree about the "no clear evidence." [Eddie Holmes] Surely not. All the WHO team have seen it. [Robert Garry] "My strategy now is try and do as much with China as I can get an insight into what the fuck is going on." More power to you on this! [Robert Garry] [thread - ID: 2021-05-10 22:32:20] @Eddie Holmes It's really something - yeah Jon publish it. [shared file(s): image.png] [Robert Garry] [thread - ID: 2021-05-10 22:32:20] @Eddie Holmes A random thought - why is eDim not a signer of RelBloomshit? Going direct at NIH OD Collins maybe too radical? Any journo that really wanted to sink in teeth would find the motherload. [shared file(s): image.png] [Robert Garry] "We should show the same determination in promoting a dispassionate science-based discourse on this difficult but important issue." They want a determined but dispassionate science-based discourse on the topic that WIV was doing GoF research with the CCP army on a secret progenitor of SC2. Like I said this is starting to really piss me off. I may put my scenario diagrams up on virological. [Robert Garry] [thread - ID: 2021-05-10 22:32:20] @Eddie Holmes https:/(www.rawstory.com/rand-paul-vs-anthony-fauci-hearing-2652950727/?utm_source=push_notifications It's getting hot out there! [Robert Garry] Wuhan wildlife markets suggests SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin Robert F. Garry1.2 Introduction Our previous commentary on the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 (Andersen et al., 2020) concluded that, "SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus (Andersen et al., 2020)." The possibility of a laboratory release or Lab Leak was also considered, but it was determined that a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 is much more likely. Recently, a team of scientists under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO) reached similar conclusions (WHO Report, 2021). Other groups have speculated that SARS-CoV-2 may be the result of undisclosed research on SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor and accidental

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/slack_pm/774

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
slack_pm:msg:08097 2021-05-11 chat message 773–774
slack_pm:msg:08098 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08099 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08100 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08101 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08102 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08103 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08104 2021-05-11 chat message 774
slack_pm:msg:08105 2021-05-11 chat message 774–775