Slack / Private Message Drop — page 774
of 1123 pages
← p.773 p.775 → · this page in the original PDF · package
SLACK_000988
[Robert Garry]
It will be interesting to see what Daszak, Koopsman and others have to say about RelBloomshit. Surely they are not
going to sit still and agree about the "no clear evidence."
[Eddie Holmes]
Surely not. All the WHO team have seen it.
[Robert Garry]
"My strategy now is try and do as much with China as I can get an insight into what the fuck is going on." More
power to you on this!
[Robert Garry]
[thread - ID: 2021-05-10 22:32:20]
@Eddie Holmes It's really something - yeah Jon publish it. [shared file(s): image.png]
[Robert Garry]
[thread - ID: 2021-05-10 22:32:20]
@Eddie Holmes A random thought - why is eDim not a signer of RelBloomshit? Going direct at NIH OD Collins
maybe too radical? Any journo that really wanted to sink in teeth would find the motherload. [shared file(s):
image.png]
[Robert Garry]
"We should show the same determination in promoting a dispassionate science-based discourse on this difficult but
important issue." They want a determined but dispassionate science-based discourse on the topic that WIV was
doing GoF research with the CCP army on a secret progenitor of SC2. Like I said this is starting to really piss me off.
I may put my scenario diagrams up on virological.
[Robert Garry]
[thread - ID: 2021-05-10 22:32:20]
@Eddie Holmes
https:/(www.rawstory.com/rand-paul-vs-anthony-fauci-hearing-2652950727/?utm_source=push_notifications It's
getting hot out there!
[Robert Garry]
Wuhan wildlife markets suggests SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin
Robert F. Garry1.2
Introduction
Our previous commentary on the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 (Andersen et al., 2020) concluded that,
"SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus (Andersen et al., 2020)." The
possibility of a laboratory release or Lab Leak was also considered, but it was determined that a natural origin of
SARS-CoV-2 is much more likely. Recently, a team of scientists under the auspices of the World Health
Organization (WHO) reached similar conclusions (WHO Report, 2021). Other groups have speculated that
SARS-CoV-2 may be the result of undisclosed research on SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor and accidental
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/774
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:08097 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 773–774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08098 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08099 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08100 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08101 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08102 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08103 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08104 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774 |
| slack_pm:msg:08105 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 774–775 |