Slack / Private Message Drop — page 752

Yeah, I don't know what that embargo comment was about... I don't expect much from the letter - probably the same uninformed speculation Relman put in PNAS. Which would be very disappointing. [2021-05-05 14:33:35] [Kristian Andersen] If they focus it on "... but they were working in mines and there's this weird FCS", I swear to God, I will not be gentle. Not a good career move on my end if it comes to that, but if it's the same old speculation with no science, well, so be it. [2021-05-05 14:35:50] [Eddie Holmes] I can't think there will be any new science. Would could there be. I bet it will be about the 8 mystery sequences. I'll scream if it rattles on about RaTG13. [2021-05-05 14:37:57] [Kristian Andersen] Yeah, there's no scientific basis, so I'm curious - I'm all for "keeping our eyes open", but not if they justify that an investigation must be done because of e.g., RaTG13. We'll see. Kinda funny this'll be in journal called "Science".... :wink: [2021-05-05 14:48:16] [Robert Garry] • There's a pretty big difference between a perspective and a letter. *Perspectives* (up to 1000 words plus 1 figure) highlight recent exciting research, but do not primarily discuss the author's own work. They may provide context for the findings within a field or explain potential interdisciplinary importance. Perspectives that comment on papers in _Science_ should add a dimension to the research and not merely be a summary of the experiments described in the paper. Although many Perspectives that comment on research published in _Science_ are solicited, we welcome inquiries regarding new advances and fresh insights. As these are meant to express a personal viewpoint, with rare exceptions, Perspectives should have no more than two authors. *Letters* (up to 300 words) discuss material published in _Science_ in the last 3 months or issues of general interest. Letters should be submitted through our Manuscript Submission and Information Portal (*https://cts.sciencemag.org*). Letters may be reviewed. The author of a paper in question is usually given an opportunity to reply. Letter submissions are acknowledged upon receipt by _Science_'s automatic system, but letter writers are not always consulted before publication. Letters are subject to editing for clarity and space. Letters rejected for print publication may be posted as eLetters. [2021-05-05 14:49:50] [Robert Garry] So yeah - reading my own post -it's probably a letter not a perspective. "Perspectives should have no more than two authors." [2021-05-05 14:52:28] [Robert Garry] Wondering who the other authors are? eDim, Lipstich. Surely they wouldn't put Alina or Metzl. Other Parisites? [2021-05-05 14:53:29] [Kristian Andersen] I would be delighted if they put Metzl on. Alina is a likely one - she really got into Jesse's head. [2021-05-05 14:54:23] [Kristian Andersen] It'd be great if they'd put something specific in there - whatever that might be. That way it's much easier to pick apart. If it's aimless speculation, well, then all one can say is "nothing new in there". [2021-05-05 15:10:20]