COVID-19 Records

Slack / Private Message Drop — page 472

of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000686

← p.471 p.473 → · this page in the original PDF · package

[2021-02-01 07:47:54] [Robert Garry] THey are like cambo bat in this regard [2021-02-01 09:27:56] [Robert Garry] In fact HA321 Rhinolophus stheno, HA363 Rhinolophus malayanus, HA442 Rhinolophus malayanus are pretty similar to Cambobat all around. [2021-02-01 12:41:30] [Kristian Andersen] [thread - ID: 2021-02-01 12:41:30] @Andrew Rambaut - do you guys have any K1191N (1188 in B117) popping up in B117 in the UK? [2021-02-01 14:21:10] [Eddie Holmes] Thanks for doing that Bob. We did notice the similarity between HA379 and GD pango in parts of the sequence. Good point about HA321, HA363 and HA442. I'll check that with Weifeng. Attached is a tree with the species marked. [shared file(s): Fig_BetaV3.2_RdRp_tidy_AIv1.pdf] [2021-02-01 14:28:53] [Andrew Rambaut] [thread - ID: 2021-02-01 12:41:30] @Kristian Andersen Seem to have 52 in a simple search. [2021-02-01 14:30:38] [Kristian Andersen] [thread - ID: 2021-02-01 12:41:30] @Kristian Andersen OK - might just be founder on our end. I just don't understand why additional mutations that get added to B.1.1.7 continue to primarily be non-synonymous.... [2021-02-01 14:34:16] [Andrew Rambaut] [thread - ID: 2021-02-01 12:41:30] @Kristian Andersen Actually 25 in England [2021-02-01 14:48:37] [Andrew Rambaut] [thread - ID: 2021-02-01 12:41:30] @Kristian Andersen There may be a couple of independent origins of K1191N here (because this is only B.1.1.7 with K1191N) but looks like a founder to the US from UK. [shared file(s): K1191N.tree.png] [2021-02-01 14:49:16] [Andrew Rambaut] No you can't have your own variant. Their ours. [2021-02-01 14:50:22] [Kristian Andersen] [thread - ID: 2021-02-01 12:41:30] @Kristian Andersen OK, thanks - makes sense since we see them in almost all (all?) Florida genomes, so I think it just hitched a ride across the ocean. At least you didn't give us Eeek - yet... I suspect we'll see that fucker pop up by himself here too. [2021-02-01 15:03:36]

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/slack_pm/472

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
slack_pm:msg:04898 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04899 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04900 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04901 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04902 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04903 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04904 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04905 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04906 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04907 2021-02-01 chat message 472
slack_pm:msg:04908 2021-02-01 chat message 472–473