Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 15
of 155 pages
← p.14 p.16 → · this page in the original PDF · package
DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
old mice, and it was extremely effective. I think that
data was immediately incorporated into the discussions,
that I was not part of, but discussions at the Federal
level, in terms of prioritizing which vaccines might go
forward.
So the reason, I think, that we were particularly so
excited about that data is that most of the vaccines that I
have tested against coronaviruses, epidemic or pandemic,
not pandemic, epidemic coronaviruses like the original SARS
2003 strain, or the MERS strain, worked effectively in
young animals. But when you took them into aged animals,
where the vaccines are less affected by about tenfold, the
vaccines would fail. And the beauty about the VRC mRNA
vaccine was that the neutralizing titers in the immune
responses were as effective in the old animals as the young
animals, so they were fully protected. And that was very
impressive.
MS. SALAZAR: And so the VRC Moderna vaccine.
DR. BARIC: Yeah. Moderna certainly was engaged.
Whether they actually manufactured the vaccine that was put
in the animals or not, or whether NIH made that vaccine and
put it in, I don't know.
MS. SALAZAR: And your vaccine, what was it called?
DR. BARIC: Oh, the Moderna vaccine?
MS. SALAZAR: No, no, no. Yours, the one that you had
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/baric_ti/15
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| baric_ti:utt:00065 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 14–15 |
| baric_ti:utt:00066 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 15 |
| baric_ti:utt:00067 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 15 |
| baric_ti:utt:00068 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 15 |
| baric_ti:utt:00069 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 15 |
| baric_ti:utt:00070 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 15–16 |