Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.1121-1122 [SLACK_001335] · slack_pm:msg:11714

Page text: p.1121, p.1122 · original PDF

Date: 2022-06-01 01:41
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Ah. I get it. She sees the document 'Summary.Feb7.pdf' and assumes it is the summary of a meeting (the 'series ofTC meetings' that Jeremy mentions). Whereas it is actually our first draft based on the only meeting we had and the work we had done in the intervening time.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-06-01 01:17 Robert F. Garry open

foia's for sr and tulane comimg i'm sure...
2022-06-01 01:34 Andrew Rambaut open

I have no record of a meeting on the 7th. Nothing in my diary, no mention in emails.
2022-06-01 01:41 Andrew Rambaut

Ah. I get it. She sees the document 'Summary.Feb7.pdf' and assumes it is the summary of a meeting (the 'series ofTC meetings' that Jeremy mentions). Whereas it is actually our first draft based on the only meeting we had and the work we had done in the intervening time.
2022-06-01 01:46 Andrew Rambaut open

If she was sensible she would simply ask everyone for the document 'Summary.Feb7.pdf' that was attached to the email from Jeremy, as she knows it exists and would probably be obtainable by FOI. I am not sure that the 'risk ofharm' defence that we gave for an email dump would extend to a request for a specific document like that so she would probably get it. And it would be a crashing disappointment when it turns out to be entirely consistent with whatwe published.
2022-06-01 02:16 Edward C. Holmes open

It's unclear what USRTK have asked USyd for. Clearly will be a lot of emails though. I do sort of hope that they publish something about a meeting on the 7th. That will show how dumb they truly are.

Full conversation →