Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1112 [SLACK_001326] · slack_pm:msg:11608

Date: 2022-04-30 11:23
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Intelligence community assessments

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

If govt officials can't privately consult with experts and not assure those experts that everything they say will not belater revealed and raked over how can said experts expected to be free to provide unfettered consultation? Next time it might be something really important :face_with_rolling_eyes:

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
If govt officials can't privately consult with experts and not assure those experts that everything they say will not belater revealed and raked over how can said experts expected to be free to provide unfettered consultation?	quoted / not their view	hypothetical conditional framing	questions

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

quoted / not their view

hypothetical conditional framing

questions

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-30 11:06 Robert F. Garry open

100%
2022-04-30 11:09 Robert F. Garry open

Plus, the call was explicitly private/confidential as it should have been. Everyone on the call signed uo for thatstipulation.
2022-04-30 11:17 Robert F. Garry open

Another black mark from me for Jesse - that call was confidential too. Yet he felt the need to blast out with his own spin. eBan failed to mention she was publishing JB's notes and you and I were left to say basically that we weren't going to discussdetails about a confidential call with heads of NIH. NO opportunity to respond to JB's BS.
2022-04-30 11:19 Robert F. Garry open

It shoud be obvious wht Tony, Francis and Lawrence refuse to release those private emails re the confidential calls and summary of confidential consultations with experts.
2022-04-30 11:23 Robert F. Garry

If govt officials can't privately consult with experts and not assure those experts that everything they say will not belater revealed and raked over how can said experts expected to be free to provide unfettered consultation? Next time it might be something really important :face_with_rolling_eyes:

Full conversation →