Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1104 [SLACK_001318] · slack_pm:msg:11514

Date: 2022-04-08 09:02
Type: chat message · slack
mentioned: Kristian G. Andersen
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: FOIA, records and transparency

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Alina gets this wrong- it's not an NIH trade secret - it's am @Kristian Andersen trade secret - and the NIH is 100%right to withhold the contents based on that FOIA exemption. [shared file(s): image.png]

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Alina gets this wrong- it's not an NIH trade secret - it's am @Kristian Andersen trade secret - and the NIH is 100%right to withhold the contents based on that FOIA exemption. [shared file(s): image.png]	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-08 09:02 Robert F. Garry

Alina gets this wrong- it's not an NIH trade secret - it's am @Kristian Andersen trade secret - and the NIH is 100%right to withhold the contents based on that FOIA exemption. [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-04-08 09:04 Robert F. Garry open

THE trade secret exemption is actually the most powerful of all the antiFOIA "Infinity Stones."
2022-04-08 09:51 Andrew Rambaut open

Yeah - Merica being capitalist an all.
2022-04-08 09:53 Robert F. Garry open

INdeed.

Full conversation →