Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1099 · slack_pm:msg:11450

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@kristian Andersen Did Mike say what Mitch Benzine was up to? Does it need discussing?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-02-27 13:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

I very much doubt that Caroline will be responsive to an email from her.
2022-02-27 13:13 Andrew Rambaut open

I think it would just encourage her
2022-02-27 13:13 Robert F. Garry open

Yeah - agree on both points! SLACK_001313
2022-02-27 13:13 Andrew Rambaut open

@Eddie Holmes - what do you think about the idea of contacting George, complaining about Jesse's imperialist letter, and suggesting that we try to work in parallel. We may not agree on the interpretation of the data but that isOK - we can at least give honest opinions.
2022-02-27 13:13 Andrew Rambaut

@kristian Andersen Did Mike say what Mitch Benzine was up to? Does it need discussing?
2022-02-27 13:13 Kristian G. Andersen open

He didn't say.
2022-02-27 13:13 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm not contacting George. He's off my Christmas card list. He's a lying shit who has destroyed I. Also, he clearly thinks that the analysis is done so if ask to work with him he'll take it as a bit of an insult. st he'll pass this request to a minion. Plus, any email to George is on FOIA-watch. If you want to contact George please go ahead but I'm not. I'll go 'hough zz
2022-02-27 13:13 Robert F. Garry open

Letter from House Republicans to NIH. Not too much of note until you get down to the end and Alan Slobodan's name comes up. [shared file(s): 2.24.22-Letter-to-NIH-Acting-Director-Tabak.pdf]
2022-02-27 13:13 Edward C. Holmes open

Determined to find all the rope they can