COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1093 [SLACK_001307] · slack_pm:msg:11387

Page text: p.1093 · original PDF

Date
2022-02-16 13:55
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Maybe we should jump on that call?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2022-02-16 13:54 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup
  2. 2022-02-16 13:54 Andrew Rambaut open
    As Kristian says - the categorical bit is 'any'
  3. 2022-02-16 13:55 Edward C. Holmes open
    My problem your letter is that it ends with the its impossible to prove/disprove statement whereas the paper has more.
  4. 2022-02-16 13:55 Kristian G. Andersen open
    "Believe" does a lot of heavy lifting here too - clearly this is our opinion (based on all the data, expertise, etc).
  5. 2022-02-16 13:55 Robert F. Garry
    Maybe we should jump on that call?
  6. 2022-02-16 13:55 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I have a call with Gates in 5mins unfortunately
  7. 2022-02-16 13:55 Andrew Rambaut open
    Bill?
  8. 2022-02-16 13:55 Andrew Rambaut open
    Or Mel?
  9. 2022-02-16 13:55 Edward C. Holmes open
    I can't as I have a plumber here

Full conversation →