Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1060 [SLACK_001274] · slack_pm:msg:11065

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I was quite forceful in my response. I'm not answering any more.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-14 13:14 Andrew Rambaut open

She replied with a lot of follow up but I have asked to switch to background for now.
2022-01-14 13:16 Andrew Rambaut open

Anyone have the timeline? When did we circulate a first draft to the group? She is saying 3 days after the call?
2022-01-14 13:16 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hmmm, not sure you want to give me information? Do you know this journalist and do you know if she's genuinely interested in understanding the science? Because if not, I wouldn't give any further details.
2022-01-14 13:16 Kristian G. Andersen open

shared file(s): February 4 document.pdf, February 6 document.pdf
2022-01-14 13:16 Edward C. Holmes

I was quite forceful in my response. I'm not answering any more.
2022-01-14 13:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

Emails out on Feb 4 and Feb 7
2022-01-14 13:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

(with those two documents)
2022-01-14 13:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

These documents will become public at some point and I think we need to figure out a way to get them released before they do. They are _great_ so there are no concerns there, but we all know what happens if DRASTIC picks these up first
2022-01-14 13:18 Andrew Rambaut open

I an not going to give further information. But as background I can state some known truths - i.e. Fauci and Collins don't personally hand out grants