Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2022-01-13 09:14 Robert F. Garry open
   Dear Nick, Cogent perhaps, but as I told the Intercept my initial impression and that of others about the FCS was wrong. All of the emails regarding the teleconference show the establishment of the hypotheses we later outlined in the Proximal Origins paper and then the assessment of these based on the available evidence. Opinions simply shiftedas the result of analysis and the examination of new data. All of our conclusions were written in our published and peer-reviewed papers (i.e., in Nature Medicine and then updated in Cell late last year). Since then more data has been published that further supports our conclusions from that initial review.
2. 2022-01-13 09:14 Robert F. Garry open
   Better?
3. 2022-01-13 09:17 Kristian G. Andersen open
   All of the emails regarding the teleconference show the establishment of the hypotheses we later outlined in the Proximal Origins paper and then the assessment of these based on the available *scientific* evidence. Opinions simply shifted as the result of analysis and the examination of new data. All of our conclusions were written in our published and peer-reviewed papers (i.e., in Nature Medicine and ~then updated~ in Cell late last year). Since then more data has been published that further supports our conclusions ~from that initial review~
4. 2022-01-13 09:17 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Yes, better, although a few suggested edits
5. 2022-01-13 09:28 Robert F. Garry
   sent that to wade btw
6. 2022-01-13 09:48 Kristian G. Andersen open
   The slightly edited version? All good. He'll probably ask for further information, but just don't reply back - he's got what he needs

Full conversation →