Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1052 [SLACK_001266] · slack_pm:msg:10994

Date: 2022-01-13 05:11
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Been looking through the old emails - I want to check they are transcribed properly and haven't been tweaked. This one is interesting (given it has Patrick Vallance talking about it looking balanced). [shared file(s): image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-13 05:11 Andrew Rambaut

Been looking through the old emails - I want to check they are transcribed properly and haven't been tweaked. This one is interesting (given it has Patrick Vallance talking about it looking balanced). [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-13 05:14 Andrew Rambaut open

This one is also good - shows we were discussing all of the possibilities: [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-13 05:18 Andrew Rambaut open

Also - there are links to google docs (only in emails between us). So if FOIs were granted would mean these go public. ``` Trying to create a summary of the most important takeaways from the discussions today. Please feel free to edit/slash/comment. Hoping that we could maybe share this with Jeremy and Tony tomorrow (if y'all think it makes sense).https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HOVHVaahY2wMwAij_Mb-rLTV3QomBai-DwRDcn506OE/edit?usp=sharing```
2022-01-13 05:19 Andrew Rambaut open

I just say this because the complete edit history is in these docs. That may help show that there was not interferencebut need to check how these might be interpreted.
2022-01-13 05:21 Andrew Rambaut open

The very start of this document is actually really good description of our position (i.e., notes from the conference call): [shared file(s): image.png]

Full conversation →