Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1047 [SLACK_001261] · slack_pm:msg:10960

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

No spooks required.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-11 14:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

Ah, yes - so probably there was a separate email to Jeremy where you summarized all of this.
2022-01-11 14:50 Edward C. Holmes open

Ok, I've found a Word docx with those emails which I assume I sent to Jeremy as an attachment although I can't find the email. It
2022-01-11 14:51 Edward C. Holmes open

It's possible I texted it to him and he then passed the text to Collins etc.
2022-01-11 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Okay, great - mystery solved! No spooks required :wink:
2022-01-11 14:51 Edward C. Holmes

No spooks required.
2022-01-11 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

So boring...
2022-01-11 14:51 Edward C. Holmes open

Disappointing
2022-01-11 14:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Next time we're accused of covering up the origin of a once in a lifetime global pandemic, let's make sure we do itfucking properly! I want helicopters, bombs, and ninjas!!!
2022-01-11 14:57 Robert F. Garry open

Absolutely - we'll get it right eventually.