Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2022-01-11 13:15 Kristian G. Andersen open
   I don't know... @Andrew Rambaut or @Eddie Holmes - could they have gotten this via your institutions?
2. 2022-01-11 13:17 Kristian G. Andersen open
   It looks to me as if these were sections Francis Collins put in an email on 2/2 (based on how it's put here: https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Letter-Re.-Feb-1-Emails-011122.pdf). Did any of us forward our conversation to either Francis, Tony, or Jeremy?
3. 2022-01-11 13:20 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Interesting - so take a look at the emails from this section - it's from Francis and we're not on it. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-11 at 1.19.16 PM.png]
4. 2022-01-11 13:21 Kristian G. Andersen open
   They're quoting stuff attributed to Mike Farzan - but it's actually from one of my emails to Eddie and Andrew, summarizing my conversation with Mike. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-11 at 1.20.04 PM.png]
5. 2022-01-11 13:23 Edward C. Holmes
   No way my Uni sent stuff. Any chance it was hacked? Some of my emails were hacked in the past.
6. 2022-01-11 13:23 Kristian G. Andersen open
   @Eddie Holmes - did you forward any of these emails to Jeremy?
7. 2022-01-11 13:24 Edward C. Holmes open
   I'll take a look.
8. 2022-01-11 13:25 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Can y'all please double check if any of the Feb. 1 emails were forwarded to _anybody_? All of these are private, butI think Francis might have had access to them on Feb. 2.
9. 2022-01-11 13:25 Robert F. Garry open
   My assumption is that if the FBI or CIA wants to get something off of my computer and if it's hooked into the internet that they can get it.

Full conversation →