Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1013 [SLACK_001227] · slack_pm:msg:10576

Date: 2021-10-01 05:17
Type: chat message · slack
mentioned: Edward C. Holmes
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Media strategy and public messaging

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Agree @Eddie Holmes would have decimated - I agree no impact - the only news was Linfa calling out 4$ about the Shi and no journo is going there. The *major* problem with the debate was that it wasn't one. It was a round robin oftalking points and except for a few brief comments like Linfa calling out Alina virtually no opportunity to challenge orrebut the nonsense. . Should have been question - answer (1 min)- rebuttal (1 min)- rebuttal (30 sec).

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
It was a round robin oftalking points and except for a few brief comments like Linfa calling out Alina virtually no opportunity to challenge orrebut the nonsense. .	quoted / not their view	sarcasm ironic or mocking marker	denies

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

It was a round robin oftalking points and except for a few brief comments like Linfa calling out Alina virtually no opportunity to challenge orrebut the nonsense. .

quoted / not their view

sarcasm ironic or mocking marker

denies

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-10-01 05:17 Robert F. Garry

Agree @Eddie Holmes would have decimated - I agree no impact - the only news was Linfa calling out 4$ about the Shi and no journo is going there. The *major* problem with the debate was that it wasn't one. It was a round robin oftalking points and except for a few brief comments like Linfa calling out Alina virtually no opportunity to challenge orrebut the nonsense. . Should have been question - answer (1 min)- rebuttal (1 min)- rebuttal (30 sec).
2021-10-01 05:28 Robert F. Garry open

First question: Dr Chan - please outline the scientific evidence for a Lab Leak.

Full conversation →