Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1012 [SLACK_001226] · slack_pm:msg:10567

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

It assumes Shi had the 99.96% virus aka everything but the 12 nt insert.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-09-30 17:13 Edward C. Holmes open

They can't have it both ways. GoF or nothing.
2021-09-30 17:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

Jesse wants it both ways - a "little bit" of engineering. Fuck off - at least be brave enough to say you think Shi cooked it up.
2021-09-30 17:18 Robert F. Garry open

That "little bit" is something he should not be able to live down.
2021-09-30 17:22 Robert F. Garry

It assumes Shi had the 99.96% virus aka everything but the 12 nt insert.
2021-09-30 17:22 Kristian G. Andersen open

He should just say "I think they put in the furin site" and be done with it - I'd respect him more if he did that.
2021-09-30 17:23 Robert F. Garry open

Absolutely - own up to the obvious - that Shi is lying and covering up the lie.
2021-09-30 17:29 Robert F. Garry open

Honestly - any one of us would have been off on 4$ and JB on question one. Linfa was great but too polite. Mike also fine, but had to walk the line with having signed the Bloom letter. JC walking the line of a unbiased journo and Science published the damn letter. Would have been better to have a leaker as "moderator."
2021-09-30 17:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup! ... and then realize you have no data to support that claim whatsoever.