Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1011 [SLACK_001225] · slack_pm:msg:10556

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

All that stuff was going into Daszak's Lancet report....

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-09-30 13:59 Edward C. Holmes open

Not that I can quite remember but it's early and my brain is not quite working. I'll have a better think after coffee.
2021-09-30 14:01 Robert F. Garry open

Here is the map - now that Iook it makes sense - the samples were collected on Jan1 [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-09-30 14:04 Kristian G. Andersen open

Thanks Bob - I think I might also be remembering this: https://andersenlab.slack.com/archives/GTGL6LY5C/p1615337838240100
2021-09-30 14:05 Robert F. Garry open

Yeah - I was thinking Koopmans' comment too
2021-09-30 14:06 Edward C. Holmes

All that stuff was going into Daszak's Lancet report....
2021-09-30 14:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, WTF.
2021-09-30 14:10 Edward C. Holmes open

So will it ever see the light of day?
2021-09-30 14:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Pretty friggin' important that it does - preferably with more information.
2021-09-30 14:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Bob - do you remember where that figure is from? Is there a table with the labels that have been added?