Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1010 [SLACK_001224] · slack_pm:msg:10541

Date: 2021-09-29 07:40
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

It would be CRAZY if they dive into this - I mean, this is next level stupidity. If ever one needed a perfect example ofa cherry picking fallacy, this is it.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-09-29 07:34 Robert F. Garry open

My recommendation to CNN was to not buy into this - of course that will likely be ignored.
2021-09-29 07:40 Kristian G. Andersen

It would be CRAZY if they dive into this - I mean, this is next level stupidity. If ever one needed a perfect example ofa cherry picking fallacy, this is it.
2021-09-29 07:46 Robert F. Garry open

I do hate to see the media fighting their way to the bottom.
2021-09-29 07:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's their fight, not ours.

Full conversation →