Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.980 [SLACK_001194] · slack_pm:msg:10210

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes. That's a good idea. The person they should talk to first is the USYD contact who is Kate Cumming ( ). She's very good.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-07-09 04:07 Andrew Rambaut open

I should say that some of the emails make it clear that you are not part of a conspiracy - this one where you sent methe pictures of the raccoon dogs: [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-07-09 04:37 Edward C. Holmes open

If asked under UK law my Uni will block any release of these emails. Their case is that they were intended to be sentin confidence and that their release will do me harm (e.g. mental health) because the of the current levels of abuse. Plenty of evidence for that. The Uni have a duty of care. They also say that releasing one will set a precedent for releasing more so they all need to be blocked.
2021-07-09 04:49 Andrew Rambaut open

Perhaps I need to get our lawyers to talk to your lawyers?
2021-07-09 04:49 Andrew Rambaut open

Given it is both ends of the same set of emails.
2021-07-09 04:56 Edward C. Holmes

Yes. That's a good idea. The person they should talk to first is the USYD contact who is Kate Cumming ( ). She's very good.
2021-07-09 04:56 Andrew Rambaut open

OK, thanks. Will pass this on.
2021-07-09 04:59 Andrew Rambaut open

I am going to try to remember to use my gmail address for all such emails in future.
2021-07-09 05:03 Edward C. Holmes open

They told me that doesn't matter if it is 'work' related. But, the very fact you using your Uni email shows that you are not hiding anything.