Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.974 [SLACK_001188] · slack_pm:msg:10167

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Getting into a bit of a rabbit hole trying to match genomes to cases. God it is a mess.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-07-04 16:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Eddie Holmes Yeah, let's make sure we keep that master on Google Doc because "final" is never actually that.
2021-07-04 16:07 Edward C. Holmes open

@Eddie Holmes Ok, I fix them on the Google Doc as soon as they all in. Is that the case now? Bloom? @Andrew Rambaut Probably post the day after tomorrow as I need to get all the authors in etc.
2021-07-04 16:21 Edward C. Holmes open

Andrew, I'll put us down as joint corresponding
2021-07-04 16:29 Andrew Rambaut open

Oh joy. I look forward to the correspondance
2021-07-04 16:30 Andrew Rambaut

Getting into a bit of a rabbit hole trying to match genomes to cases. God it is a mess.
2021-07-04 16:31 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm use there are DRASTIC members who think that is a deliberate ploy to mislead
2021-07-04 17:16 Edward C. Holmes open

I've drafted an author order. Not easy. Happy to take complaints.
2021-07-04 17:21 Andrew Rambaut open

@Eddie Holmes I think they are all in there. No Bloom - doesn't say anything worth citing Day after is fine. Still need to fix up the tree after looking into the 13 cases in the WHO report.
2021-07-04 17:49 Edward C. Holmes open

@Eddie Holmes Great. I'll do a quick hand job on the refs then.