Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.973 [SLACK_001187] · slack_pm:msg:10157

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Stephen after Eddie and Bob or myself before Andrew (3rd and 2nd last). Then kinda just fill up with the rest

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-07-04 14:51 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, I don't mind going point. Who wants to go rear gunner?
2021-07-04 14:54 Robert F. Garry open

On PO1 @Kristian Andersen was point and I was rear gunner - seems symmetrical that @Eddie Holmes should be point and @Andrew Rambaut the rear gunner on this one. Just saying...
2021-07-04 14:59 Kristian G. Andersen open

Agreed
2021-07-04 15:01 Kristian G. Andersen

Stephen after Eddie and Bob or myself before Andrew (3rd and 2nd last). Then kinda just fill up with the rest
2021-07-04 15:02 Edward C. Holmes open

Works for me.
2021-07-04 15:19 Edward C. Holmes open

Andrew, before it goes on Virological, I will need to edit a word doc because there a few errors in the ref that need tobe hand fixed. So, don't just post the Google Doc.
2021-07-04 15:23 Robert F. Garry open

Eddie, Stephan .... then Bob (3rd last) then Kristian (2nd last) and Andrew at the end. I could also see Angie, David, Alex following Stephan then the rest in btwn alphabetical.
2021-07-04 15:31 Andrew Rambaut open

@Eddie Holmes No problem. Will post tomorrow? I can fix errors in references in PaperPile if you give me a list - Probably good to keep the GoogleDoc as master.