COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.964 [SLACK_001178] · slack_pm:msg:10046

Page text: p.964 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-25 15:15
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Our job is not to review. I only reject if it is dangerous/malicious/nutso.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-25 15:14 Andrew Rambaut open
    They need to check the raw data (which is available)
  2. 2021-06-25 15:14 Andrew Rambaut open
    However, I assume it isn't your job to review it
  3. 2021-06-25 15:15 Andrew Rambaut open
    You could at least say they should contact CoG to collaborate
  4. 2021-06-25 15:15 Andrew Rambaut open
    As that are the GISAID rules
  5. 2021-06-25 15:15 Edward C. Holmes
    Our job is not to review. I only reject if it is dangerous/malicious/nutso.
  6. 2021-06-25 15:15 Andrew Rambaut open
    Accept it then - won't hurt anyone
  7. 2021-06-25 15:16 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes, that's my inclination. Hopefully people will just shit on it quickly.
  8. 2021-06-25 15:18 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yeah. Nick will destroy it with a quick look at the BAM file and a tweet
  9. 2021-06-25 15:19 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Will he delete the BAM file then? Because... you know.

Full conversation →