Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.963 [SLACK_001177] · slack_pm:msg:10023

Date: 2021-06-24 09:41
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Just had another call with NIH folks and they're really struggling with all the different evidence out there. Should weconsider sharing our draft with them at this stage or should we wait?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-24 09:41 Kristian G. Andersen

Just had another call with NIH folks and they're really struggling with all the different evidence out there. Should weconsider sharing our draft with them at this stage or should we wait?
2021-06-24 09:44 Andrew Rambaut open

Shouldn't take long to make a first draft of it. I think it is looking pretty good. Need to check it for any lose-ends orchinks that can be exploited to cast doubt.
2021-06-24 09:45 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I'm going to go through this over the weekend - bloody study section is killing me, but it's DONE tomorrow.

Full conversation →