Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.956-957 [SLACK_001170] · slack_pm:msg:09951

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I cant read it now but they are mental

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-21 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open

The problem with the rooting is that it's very complex so not sure we want to add it - working on a paper with Joel and Marc that should settle this. But it's just so frustrating to see their naiveté - especially since they know a lot more about rooting than I do. But this one is obvious...
2021-06-21 17:27 Edward C. Holmes open

Ok...I'll find it....definitely keep this to yourself...
2021-06-21 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh boy.
2021-06-21 17:29 Edward C. Holmes open

Check out Figure 2 [shared file(s): 21-09335_Proof_hi.pdf]
2021-06-21 17:30 Andrew Rambaut

I cant read it now but they are mental
2021-06-21 17:31 Edward C. Holmes open

They say D614G was there in September 2019
2021-06-21 17:31 Andrew Rambaut open

@Kristian Andersen We talk about the 2 haplotypes (I think we should add the 3rd). We can just say that the 1100mutations to bat makes it impossible and cite Sergeis reply to the Forsters. I will come up with something in the morning
2021-06-21 17:31 Kristian G. Andersen open

OMG, he mentioned "early cases in Europe" on the call yesterday and how "all the timing may well change". Come on - this is dumb. I didn't want to get into an argument about it on the call, but come on guys. :face_with_rolling_eyes:
2021-06-21 17:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm sure Chairman Xi will welcome this paper with open arms.